Categorized as Response: Response Improving the Exercise of the Attorney General’s Immigration Referral Power: Lessons from the Battle over the “Categorical Approach” to Classifying Crimes David A. Martin Response Getting Clamorous About the Silence Penalty Mark W. Bennett Response Delegation, Time, and Congressional Capacity: A Response to Adler and Walker Richard J. Pierce, Jr. Response Protecting the Commercial Value of Iowans’ Identity Nationwide: A Response to Colon’s Proposed State Statute Nanci K. Carr Response Rediscovering the Classical Liberal Constitution: A Reply to Professor Hovenkamp Richard A. Epstein Response The Problem with Preferences Daniel J. Bussel Response The Republican Senate and Regular Order Carl Tobias Response "The Magna Carta of Free Enterprise" Really? Daniel A. Crane Response Midnight Agency Adjudication: Attorney General Review of Board of Immigration Appeals Decisions Margaret H. Taylor Response Christmas in July: A Response to David Fagundes, Why Less Property Is More Brian L. Frye Response The Future of Empirical Legal Studies: Observations on Holte & Sichelman’s Cycles of Obviousness Jason Rantanen Response Competition and the Future of M&A Litigation Charles R. Korsmo & Minor Myers Response Measuring Law School Excellence: Diversity Among Law Students Kevin R. Johnson Response A Response to Professor Leff’s Tax Planning “Olive Branch” for Marijuana Dealers Philip T. Hackney Response Asylum and Terrorism: The Death of Human Rights Law? Moria Paz Response Clockwork Corporations: A Valiant Effort to Do the Impossible John Hasnas Response Using Failure to Function Doctrine to Protect Free Speech and Competition in Trademark Law Lisa P. Ramsey Response Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Price Gouging (But Were Afraid to Ask): A Response to Ramsi Woodcock, The Efficient Queue and the Case Against Dynamic Pricing Brian L. Frye Response Considering the Risks of Medical Paternalism and Tort Liability for Reproductive Harms: A Conversation with Jill Wieber Lens Meghan Boone Response How Long Do We Have to Play the “Great Game”? Lawrence A. Hamermesh Response Debunking the Myth of the Copyright Troll Apocalypsee Shyamkrishna Balganesh & Jonah B. Gelbach Response The Limits of Marijuana Legalization in the States Sam Kamin Response Trademark Use Rides Again Mark P. McKenna Response A Court with No Names: Anonymity and Celebrity on the “Kardashian Court” Howard M. Wasserman Response Reforming Preference Law Dalié Jiménez Response Remembering Furman’s Comparative Proportionality: A Response to Smith and Staihar William W. Berry III Response What We Disagree About when We Disagree About School Choice Aaron Saiger Response The Light Touch of Caveat Emptor in Crypto’s Wild West Mihailis E. Diamantis Response A Malpractice-Based Duty to Disclose the Risk of Stillbirth: A Response to Lens Nadia N. Sawicki Response Many Laws of Discrimination: The Multiple Sources of Constitutional–Statutory Convergence Bertrall L. Ross II Response What Changes in American Constitutional Law and What Does Not? Edward A. Purcell, Jr. Response Propping up Corporate Crime with Corporate Character Miriam H. Baer Response Centering Black Pregnancy: A Response to Medical Paternalism, Stillbirth, & Blindsided Mothers Brietta R. Clark Response The Golden or Bronze Age of Judicial Selection? Jed Handelsman Shugerman Response The Attorney General’s Disruptive Immigration Power Bijal Shah Response The Promise of Corporate Character Theory Matthew Caulfield & William S. Laufer Response Referral, Remand, and Dialogue in Administrative Law Christopher J. Walker Response Copyright Trolls and the Common Law Brad A. Greenberg Response Preclusion and the Denial of Class Certification: Avoiding the “Death by a Thousand Cuts” Richard D. Freer Response Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Customer Behavior to Discrimination Law: Who Counts as a “Customer”? Patrick S. Shin Response Commentary on Reid Kress Weisbord and David Horton, Boilerplate and Default Rules in Wills Law: An Empirical Analysis Danaya C. Wright Response Demand Response and Market Power Bruce R. Huber Response Reading the Readers Andrew Gilden Response Duck-Rabbit: A Reply to Professor Hasnas Mihailis E. Diamantis Response Moving Past Dual Federalism to Advance Electric Grid Neutrality Hannah J. Wiseman Response Antitrust, Regulatory Harm, and Economic Liberty Alan J. Meese Response Boilerplate in Pour-Over Wills Mark Glover Response An Academic Elegy: Comment on The Voting Rights Act in Winter: The Death of a Superstatute Heather K. Gerken Response Multiple Attempts at Class Certification Tobias Barrington Wolff Response Recalibrating the Federal Economic Crime Guideline: An Admiring Rejoinder to Judge Bennett and Friends Frank O. Bowman, III Response Looking Glass: A Reply to Caulfield and Laufer Mihailis E. Diamantis Response Remember Not to Forget Furman: A Response to Professor Smith Sam Kamin & Justin Marceau Response Liberty to Subordinate? Kimberly West-Faulcon Response Aggregate Litigation & All That We Do Not Know Brooke D. Coleman Response From Here to There: A Reply to Professor Baer Mihailis E. Diamantis Response Betting Against the (Big) House: Bargaining Away Criminal Trial Rights Raymond J. McKoski Response The Presumptions of Classical Liberal Constitutionalism Matthew J. Lindsay Response The Exceptional Nature of Method Claims: A Response to Professor Holbrook Jason Rantanen Response A Modest Proposal? Regulating Customer Discrimination Through the Firm Naomi Schoenbaum Response White-Collar Showdown Mihailis E. Diamantis Response The Need for a General Theory of Discrimination: A Comment on Katharine T. Bartlett & Mitu Gulati, Discrimination by Customers Richard H. McAdams Response Markets, Rights, and Discrimination by Customers Heather M. Whitney Response Arriving Where We’ve Been: Death’s Indignity and the Eighth Amendment Phyllis Goldfarb
Response Improving the Exercise of the Attorney General’s Immigration Referral Power: Lessons from the Battle over the “Categorical Approach” to Classifying Crimes David A. Martin
Response Delegation, Time, and Congressional Capacity: A Response to Adler and Walker Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Response Protecting the Commercial Value of Iowans’ Identity Nationwide: A Response to Colon’s Proposed State Statute Nanci K. Carr
Response Rediscovering the Classical Liberal Constitution: A Reply to Professor Hovenkamp Richard A. Epstein
Response Midnight Agency Adjudication: Attorney General Review of Board of Immigration Appeals Decisions Margaret H. Taylor
Response The Future of Empirical Legal Studies: Observations on Holte & Sichelman’s Cycles of Obviousness Jason Rantanen
Response A Response to Professor Leff’s Tax Planning “Olive Branch” for Marijuana Dealers Philip T. Hackney
Response Using Failure to Function Doctrine to Protect Free Speech and Competition in Trademark Law Lisa P. Ramsey
Response Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Price Gouging (But Were Afraid to Ask): A Response to Ramsi Woodcock, The Efficient Queue and the Case Against Dynamic Pricing Brian L. Frye
Response Considering the Risks of Medical Paternalism and Tort Liability for Reproductive Harms: A Conversation with Jill Wieber Lens Meghan Boone
Response Debunking the Myth of the Copyright Troll Apocalypsee Shyamkrishna Balganesh & Jonah B. Gelbach
Response A Court with No Names: Anonymity and Celebrity on the “Kardashian Court” Howard M. Wasserman
Response Remembering Furman’s Comparative Proportionality: A Response to Smith and Staihar William W. Berry III
Response A Malpractice-Based Duty to Disclose the Risk of Stillbirth: A Response to Lens Nadia N. Sawicki
Response Many Laws of Discrimination: The Multiple Sources of Constitutional–Statutory Convergence Bertrall L. Ross II
Response Centering Black Pregnancy: A Response to Medical Paternalism, Stillbirth, & Blindsided Mothers Brietta R. Clark
Response Preclusion and the Denial of Class Certification: Avoiding the “Death by a Thousand Cuts” Richard D. Freer
Response Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Customer Behavior to Discrimination Law: Who Counts as a “Customer”? Patrick S. Shin
Response Commentary on Reid Kress Weisbord and David Horton, Boilerplate and Default Rules in Wills Law: An Empirical Analysis Danaya C. Wright
Response An Academic Elegy: Comment on The Voting Rights Act in Winter: The Death of a Superstatute Heather K. Gerken
Response Recalibrating the Federal Economic Crime Guideline: An Admiring Rejoinder to Judge Bennett and Friends Frank O. Bowman, III
Response The Need for a General Theory of Discrimination: A Comment on Katharine T. Bartlett & Mitu Gulati, Discrimination by Customers Richard H. McAdams