105 Iowa L. Rev. 575 (2020)
Download PDF


The Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association has opened a door that has remained closed for more than a quarter century, allowing states to begin legalizing sports gaming. State lawmakers’ excitement in seeking a new way to generate revenue is palpable through the more than 25 different bills that have been introduced to legalize sports betting since the May 2018 Supreme Court decision. In addition to the interest shown by state lawmakers, Senators Orrin Hatch and Charles Schumer introduced a federal sports gambling bill. The desire to generate revenue for states via a source other than new taxes is understandable; however, there has been a rush in many states to implement sports wagering schemes that either provide maximum benefit to the state, while trying to be first in the region offering sports betting, and seemingly neglecting wholesale objectives such as recapturing money from sports betting’s vast $150 billion black market. The regulation of sports betting is a complicated topic often involving state, tribal, and federal governments. This Article discusses the challenges of regulating sports betting at the state, tribal, and federal levels, before identifying and suggesting best practices for regulation in the space and reviewing possible alternative schemes for regulation.

Saturday, February 15, 2020