RESPONSE
Improving the Exercise of the Attorney General’s Immigration Referral Power: Lessons from the Battle over the “Categorical Approach” to Classifying Crimes
David A. Martin

RESPONSE
Midnight Agency Adjudication: Attorney General Review of Board of Immigration Appeals Decisions
Margaret H. Taylor

RESPONSE
Asylum and Terrorism: The Death of Human Rights Law?
Moria Paz

ESSAY
Foster v. Chatman and the Failings of Batson
Patrick C. Brayer

ESSAY
Abstracting About “Abstract Idea”
Jasper L. Tran

RESPONSE
What Changes in American Constitutional Law and What Does Not?
Edward A. Purcell, Jr.

RESPONSE
The Attorney General’s Disruptive Immigration Power
Bijal Shah

RESPONSE
Some Thoughts on the Relevance of Customer Behavior to Discrimination Law: Who Counts as a “Customer”?
Patrick S. Shin

RESPONSE
Reading the Readers
Andrew Gilden

ESSAY
State v. Smith Perpetuates Rape Myths and Should Be Formally Disavowed
Tyler J. Buller

RESPONSE
Recalibrating the Federal Economic Crime Guideline: An Admiring Rejoinder to Judge Bennett and Friends
Frank O. Bowman, III

RESPONSE
Aggregate Litigation & All That We Do Not Know
Brooke D. Coleman

ESSAY
Reading Together and Apart: Juries, Courts, and Substantial Similarity in Copyright Law
Laura A. Heymann

RESPONSE
The Presumptions of Classical Liberal Constitutionalism
Matthew J. Lindsay

RESPONSE
The Exceptional Nature of Method Claims: A Response to Professor Holbrook
Jason Rantanen

RESPONSE
A Modest Proposal? Regulating Customer Discrimination Through the Firm
Naomi Schoenbaum

RESPONSE
White-Collar Showdown
Mihailis E. Diamantis

RESPONSE
The Need for a General Theory of Discrimination: A Comment on Katharine T. Bartlett & Mitu Gulati, Discrimination by Customers
Richard H. McAdams

RESPONSE
Markets, Rights, and Discrimination by Customers
Heather M. Whitney

ESSAY
Difficulties Standard for Area Variances
N. William Hines

RESPONSE
Arriving Where We’ve Been: Death’s Indignity and the Eighth Amendment
Phyllis Goldfarb